David MacRay wrote: I probably should side with you guys since I'm riding on my 20 year old PPL but if you want to have the privilege of flying outside Canada get a PPL.
Is it really that much harder?
Correct answer is probably, "Shut up, go fly, study and exercise more Dave."
David
Your are correct , it is not that much harder
However , the PPL is about 1/3 more expensive than the RPP and really not any safer.
Ill be flamed for that comment but look at it this way . The average PPL does pretty much the exact same type of flying that an RPP pilot does. Most PP's I know fly VFR day time and rarely enter the US. They mostly fly around in a four seaters or less. The RPP can carry only one passenger , no real difference in one or three. The RPP can fly a 4 seat aircaft and there is no reason they should not be able to fly with more than one passenger
My point is that the RPP has been around long enough to prove that it is as safe as the PPL. So in the interest of trying to rejuvenate aviation , why not get rid of the restrictions on the RPP and make it the standard license.
The PPL course has become swollen with both in cost and content. While its a good stepping stone for a CPL, its too costly for many that just want to fly privately.
There is absolutely no reason to restrict the more affordable route . In reality , the PPL is becoming redundant. If anyone tries to tell you the RPP is not a safe license , tell them to bugger off. The only people that are against the RPP are the flying schools that want to get more of your money
