Most commonly misunderstood IR theories/excercises

Aviation & Pilots Forums, discuss topics that interest Pilots and Aviation Enthusiasts. Looking for information on how to become a pilot? Check out our Free online pilot exams and flight training resources section.
Fendermandan
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:54 pm

Yahhh, you thought PPL training sucks. Rant is coming, but I will spare you for now.  :D


Strega
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 1:43 am

Im gonna take a stab and say actually flying in cloud.. 
HiFlyChick
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 9:54 pm

HuronPotentialConflict wrote:
Strega wrote: Im gonna take a stab and say actually flying in cloud..
The title is IR theories/exercises. The instrument rating does not require training in IMC.

>:D
No, but it should :)
(just not practical, though - winter, ice in cloud, etc)
David MacRay
Posts: 1259
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:00 pm

I think you guys are right so I'll start a re-word on Strega's response.

"Flying exclusively by reference of instruments, navigating via electronic signals from ground based stations."

I say "Ground based" because anyone can turn on a phone and find out where they are using GPS. If they learn the more difficult ways to locate their position..

GPS "should" be easy.
Chuck Ellsworth

When I did my instrument flight training we used two stage amber for the vision limiting device.

It is just as good as flying in actual IMC...actually it is better because the instructor has normal visibility outsied of the airplane.
Colonel
Posts: 3450
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am

Instrument training at night (with a hood)
works pretty well, too. 

What the student sees with their peripheral
vision really doesn't help much.
praveen4143
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 12:57 am

Chuck Ellsworth wrote: When I did my instrument flight training we used two stage amber for the vision limiting device.

It is just as good as flying in actual IMC...actually it is better because the instructor has normal visibility outsied of the airplane.
I've heard about the two stage amber a few times now. Would someone care to explain how this works? Maybe a picture or video? I'd love to see how this worked.

Thanks!
mmm...bacon
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 2:19 am

Chuck probably knows more about this ('cause he's old enough to remember it?;))
Essentially, the interior windows of the plane are coated with an amber film, while the student wears a set of goggles that are tinted blue.  The interference between the two colours blocks out visibility to the outside for the student, while the instructor can see normally (albeit with an amber tinge.)  Much better than the current hood, as you dont get the slight cues of the world out of the corner of your eye..

If you run a google search, there's a few hits, and a fairly lengthy discussion over on the *other* forum..
Chuck Ellsworth

Chuck probably knows more about this ('cause he's old enough to remember it?;))
Essentially, the interior windows of the plane are coated with an amber film, while the student wears a set of goggles that are tinted blue.  The interference between the two colours blocks out visibility to the outside for the student, while the instructor can see normally (albeit with an amber tinge.)  Much better than the current hood, as you dont get the slight cues of the world out of the corner of your eye..
Exactly....

The pilot flying sees everything inside the airplane tinted blue but still has all the visual clues of normal sight.....unlike wearing a hood where you only have tunnel vision.

A hood is an unorthodox contraption as it changes the visual clues one is working with.

Much like wearing several condoms, you can perform the activity but it just feels different as some tactile senses are missing....

Two stage amber on the other hand allows for a normal picture of everything inside the airplane and everything outside of the airplane is black.

As for the visual changes for the instructor it actually enhances the picture by making things look clearer...like skiing with amber glasses on.

Two stage amber was replaced by the hood because two stage amber required a bit of effort to install and remove before flight.

When we did our Commercial pilot flight test we had to demonstrate recovery from unusual attitudes with limited panel for instruments.....airspeed. turn and bank and altimeter....with two stage amber.

A lot of pilots claim the old school guys had inferior training.

How many commercial pilot candidates can recover from unusual attitudes with limited panel only ?
praveen4143
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 12:57 am

Chuck Ellsworth wrote:
Two stage amber was replaced by the hood because two stage amber required a bit of effort to install and remove before flight.
With modern technology, I wonder if we could make this a bit easier now? I'm quite intrigued by this concept and feel that this would do a lot of good towards training. Lemme see...
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post