Ah yes, Airbus is making those rebranded C series planes. Sorry about that,Nark wrote: Sun Apr 09, 2023 12:48 amDavid MacRay wrote: Sat Apr 08, 2023 2:02 pm For example aren’t those terrific new Embraer 175s the design Bombardier sold them?
I don’t know if I buy that… the E170’s is philosophically different from the CRJ, as well as the fuselage (double-bubble), flight control’s priorities, electrical, hydraulic’s etc…
There is a ton of carry over from the E145’s, but a huge improvement on the “quiet and dark” concept from Airbus.
If you said Airbus, I would have believed you a bit more.
I’ve been wrong once before, maybe this is the second time?
Flying Bathtubs
-
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:16 am
- Colonel
- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
- Location: Over The Runway
It would be interesting to do a final accounting for how many billions the Canadian taxpayer gave Bombardier, and what the taxpayers got in return.
"Corporate welfare" I think the private-sector economists referred to that subsidization?
I may be wrong, but domestic fighter production could have been CSeries x1000
"Corporate welfare" I think the private-sector economists referred to that subsidization?
I may be wrong, but domestic fighter production could have been CSeries x1000
45 / 47 => 95 3/4%
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 1712 Views
-
Last post by Eric Janson
-
- 21 Replies
- 4405 Views
-
Last post by Liquid_Charlie