When Good Priming Goes Bad™

Aviation & Pilots Forums, discuss topics that interest Pilots and Aviation Enthusiasts. Looking for information on how to become a pilot? Check out our Free online pilot exams and flight training resources section.
Post Reply
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2590
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

You wouldn't think it would be hard to make gasoline burn, but ....

Heading into winter, it's going to get harder to make your aircraft piston engine
start, when it's cold. That's because liquid gasoline does not burn - only gasoline
vapor, and 100LL evaporates really badly, to make it work at FL240. Mogas is
much, much better in the winter, if you can run it. There's a reason you can't
run mogas over 6,000 feet.

The whole idea of priming is bizarre. You jump into your car or truck or whatever,
and turn the key and off you go, every time. But with aircraft piston engines we
are back in the stone age, with manual mixture control and manual primer. Surprisingly,
there isn't a manual spark advance control, like old cars have - aircraft piston engines
are locked down to a set advance (except for starting, with impulse couplings etc).

Anyways. Prime, then wait. Don't crank immediately. Wait for the liquid gasoline
to evaporate
, especially if your engine isn't toasty warm from a preheat or previous
run earlier that day. The colder it is, the longer you should wait.

I actually like to pull the prop through, after I prime, to distribute the fuel as best
I can, to all the cylinders and avoid hydraulic lock from fuel (see below). That gives
me really good starts.

I hate to see people cranking and cranking and cranking. You're overheating your
starter and running down your battery, and it's not working.

When an engine doesn't start - assuming you have spark - it means that you have
too little or too much fuel vapor in the cylinder - it's outside the possible burn range.
This is the really tricky thing - figuring out if you need to prime some more, or if you
need to keep cranking to get rid of some of the fuel already in the cylinder, and pump
it out the exhaust.

Annoyingly, fire OUTSIDE the engine is a real problem, which is pretty fucking annoying,
because it won't burn INSIDE the engine and start. Augh.

Where does the excess fuel go with your engine, when you over-prime? With my TCM
IO-360 Maule, the fuel overflow tubes all dump the fuel on the ground underneath the
engine (421 was the same way) and it's possible to light off the fuel on the ground.
This is not a big deal, even if people outside start to run around excitedly waving their
arms. Just keep the prop turning and blow it out like a candle. Remember, it's burning
outside the airplane. Ok, underneath it, but prop slipstream cures that.

Lycoming are different (and I will talk about why, below). They like to run fuel out
the intake, which is really dangerous. When this starts burning, you can do a lot of
damage. Again, keep cranking and suck it into the engine.

So, when you over-prime, fuel can go out your exhaust and burn (which is pretty
harmless if you keep it running), fuel can go out onto the ground and burn (which
is pretty harmless if you keep it running) and fuel can go out the intake, which is
kind of scary when it lights up. Again, keep the engine running to suck it in.

I remember my kid, starting the Pitts, would get flame at least a foot shooting out
forward out of the air intake. I was kind of worried he was going to toast the prop,
but I never saw any damage. If you have an air filter, you want to look carefully for
any damage, and replace it. I am not a big fan of air and oil filters. Both are causes
of engine failure. Pitts has neither air filter, nor an oil filter, so neither can fail
catastrophically.

Here's a fascinating and terribly obscure detail: TCM heads are crossflow, and
Lycomings are not. You're a pilot, and you say, why should I give a shit? Well,
bent connecting rods is why. Ask Seneca College about landing on the highway
in Vermont.

So. What is a crossflow head? Well, that's when you have the intake port on one
side of the cylinder, and the exhaust port on the other. If you look at your fuel injected
Continental engine, you will note the intake is on the TOP of the engine, and the exhaust
is on the bottom. This is supposed to make more power, but it has consequences.

Image

Lycoming, on the other hand, have both the intake and exhaust on the BOTTOM of
the cylinders. This is why fuel from over-priming a Lycoming fuel-injected engine
runs down, out the intake.

Image

But when you over-prime a flat TCM, the intake port on the top can collect the fuel, if
the intake valve happens to be open for a cylinder. Hm. Hydraulic lock, anyone?

If you have enough incompressible fuel in a cylinder, you can actually quietly bend the
connecting rod, which will fail later in flight. As I said, this is more of a flat TCM problem
than a flat Lycoming one. Certainly a problem with oil accumulation in the bottom
jugs of a radial, but nobody flies them any more. This is all about horizontally opposed
engines.

This begs the question: how much do have to prime a flat TCM before I can possibly
bend a connecting rod, which may fail and punch a hole in the crankcase later?

Image

Well, electric prime on my Lycoming AEIO-540 is 6 gph with the throttle and mixture
full forward. That's 1 gph going into each cylinder, because there is no return line.
540 cubic inches is nine liters, that that means each cylinder is 9/6 or 1.5 liters.
With a 10:1 compression ratio (close enough for back of the envelope) that's
1500cc/10 or 150cc of fuel that I need in that cylinder before I have trouble.

150cc is 150/3780cc = 0.04 gallons. At one GPH flow rate per cylinder that's
0.04 x 60 minutes/hour or 2.4 minutes of continuous priming.

So. If I prime for 2.4 minutes, it is possible to hydraulic lock my Lycoming. And
actually it isn't, because I don't have a crossflow head - the intake port is below
the cylinder, and the liquid fuel is just going to run down, out the intake, and start
a fire there.

But if I have a TCM with the intake valve OPEN, I start risking hydraulic locking after
two and a half minutes or so, assuming the same relative numbers.

That's a long, goddamned time. And begs the question - how on earth did people
actually manage to bend their connecting rods, over-priming? We know it happens,
so people are out there, doing it .. and later, when the conrod fails and punches a
hole in the crankcase, people are puzzled. Except for the manufacturer, who knows
exactly why.

Which brings me back to my old habit of pulling the prop blades through X times
after I prime, to ensure that there is no hydraulic lock. And, I get a great start.

Anyways. Sorry for bombarding y'all with yet another wall of text. This shit is what's
going through my brain, all the time. I remember someone asking Stephen King why
he wrote such weird shit. He replied, "Why do you think I have a choice?"

I don't want a pickle. I just want to ride on my motor-sickle. I think I'll do that, now.

Image

No choke or priming the Monkey. Electronic fuel injection, works first time, every time,
hot or cold.


45 / 47 => 95 3/4%
anofly
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 6:26 pm

My mechanic used to say ... at minus 15 or below its hard to overprime.... probably talking lycoming. He also says (and I sort of agree ) that 100LL does not evaporate as good as it used to...
I do prefer a bit of pre heat at sub zero C temps. I have to be careful not to overprime when the engine is warm and the air is not!!!
Ran like a top yesterday.
GReat write up Andrew...
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2590
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

I should mention a HUGE difference in priming ....

While a fuel-injected engine will prime all cylinders - and give you a much
better chance of starting, because you may fire initialiy on one, then two,
then three cylinders ...

A carbureted engine will have a random number of cylinders plumbed
with lines from the manual fuel primer plunger. It may be one. It may be
two. It may be three cylinders that get fuel for the start.

Also, keep in mind that you may very well only have one (left mag) spark
plug firing. This is the normal configuration for a Lycoming: left magneto
has the impulse coupling, and the right mag is grounded during cranking.

So, the geniuses at the airframe factory, if they have plumbed ONE cylinder
expect you to start with ONE spark plug, as well. No wonder aircraft engines
struggle with starting.

Now, nearly all carbureted engines have what is called an "accelerator pump"
which squirts fuel into the engine when you advance the throttle. I have
instructed on ancient taildraggers that don't have an accelerator pump and
you are in for a world of hurt if you don't stay ahead of that trap.

If you pump the throttle on a carbureted engine when it is not running,
because the carburetor is located underneath the engine (updraft) what
happens is gravity pulls the raw fuel down into the carb heat flapper box,
and this is another very dangerous variation on intake fires (see above).

Some POH's actually recommend giving the throttle a squirt before cranking
to get some gas into the carb heat flapper for start, because their primer config
is so bad.

Because of the risk of an intake fire, I think pumping the throttle before
cranking is a very bad idea.

However. If you are a very smart boy, you will realize that while you are
cranking, the air is being sucked up into the engine, and if you pump the
throttle once or twice with an updraft carburetor ONLY WHILE IT IS CRANKING
you can introduce fuel into ALL cylinders, and vastly improve your odds of
starting with a far superior prime of ALL cylinders, not just one or two.

Beware of intake fires. If you have one, keep cranking and get a start and
suck it all into the engine. Melt the starter down, to avoid burning the aircraft
down.

There was a recent intake fire of a Pitts - in summer, go figure - and the
people died after takeoff. Don't do that. When you have an intake fire,
the cowls must come off and an inspection is required. If there is damage
to the air filter it must be replaced. Similarly with the carb heat flapper,
if you are unfortunately to have all this junk.

Remember what Bill Lear said. If it's not there, it can't break. Like your
oil filter adapter, which loves to crack and drain all the engine oil out in
flight. See all the AD's.

And try not to use starter fluid on your aircraft engine this winter. That
depresses me, for some reason. Preheat, and try not to burn the aircraft
down in the process.

-- EDIT --

Back to hydraulic locking (from oil). It is not actually completely lost in
the mists of time. I know a guy with a Nanchang. Chinese radial engine,
and the previous owner blew the bottom jug off TWICE, because he didn't
pull the prop through before cranking.

Not once. TWICE. I guess he didn't enjoy the previous unnecesssary engine
work after the first time he blew the bottom jug off, and wanted to do it again?

There are two different kinds of pilots in this world. Those that will touch
the prop, and those that will not. I respect those that will not, but I might point
out that like with a taildragger, if you spend a little time developing some
knowledge and skill, it can come in very handy, to be able to safely pull the
prop through, which I do before every takeoff, with the mags off.

It primes the engine, it allows me to check the compression (stuck open
exhaust valve?) and it makes sure that I will not bend a connecting rod
when I start.

Also, if I can do the above, it's not too hard to turn the mags on and flip
a blade and start the engine with no electrical system required, because
the engine is carefully primed.

I have hand-bombed every four cylinder and six cylinder you can think of,
except the geared engines. I don't hand bomb those. But we used to hand
bomb the R-985. If you prime it right, it's possible.

Learning to prime precisely not only allows you to hand bomb if needed,
it allows you to reduce the wear and tear on your starter and battery.

If you've ever pulled a lawn mower cord:



Or, you can crank crank crank. Crank crank crank. Crank crank crank.
That's what rich gringos do.
45 / 47 => 95 3/4%
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post