http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/assets ... ov2019.pdf
My two scenarios were engine failure and control problems. What an investigator I'd make! 8)
SNOWBIRD ACCIDENT CAUSE REVEALED
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:31 am
The crash site looks like a perfect place for a forced landing!
I guess that's not how people are trained in the military.
I guess that's not how people are trained in the military.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:32 pm
The field may be OK for a C152 but not for a CT114 that was probably to low and too fast for a safe landing. The military is very well trained but sometimes you just do not have a Royal Flush so you fold. C152, 65 kts vs CT114 115+ kts. on final.
Barney
Barney
-
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 6:46 pm
It was once explained to me as an odds game. Figure you have 60-80% chance of surviving a forced landing (or whatever they determined) and a 99% chance of surviving if you punch out. Plane’s a wrote-off either way, so hit the silk.The crash site looks like a perfect place for a forced landing!
Made sense to me - the airplane is just a replaceable thing.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 2814 Views
-
Last post by Scudrunner
-
- 35 Replies
- 15418 Views
-
Last post by Colonel
-
- 0 Replies
- 820 Views
-
Last post by Scudrunner