[quote author=Colonel Sanders link=topic=9535.msg27340#msg27340 date=1553607931]
I would strongly suspect that this is going to be added
to the sim training, as part of BA's upcoming changes.
[/quote]
Already starting to be rolled out:
http://flash.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/ ... 475-1.html
Funny how when they fully disclose the system and train the pilots on how to recognize and deal with it, it becomes easy!
Gerry
737 max groundings.
Would not both of these accidents have had the same results had the problem been a real run-away nose down trim after take-off? Eg .. Say the pilot's nose down control column trim button got stuck? Isn't the procedure to deal with a real run away trim the same as the MCAS triggered nose down trim? Actually I'd have thought a real runaway nose down trim would be worse because it won't pause and restart so you'd have even less time to correct it.
Having said that it does seem silly to have a single AOA input as the driver when there are two that could be queried to ensure they are in approximate agreement.
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:31 am
[quote author=cgzro link=topic=9535.msg27349#msg27349 date=1553656923]
Would not both of these accidents have had the same results had the problem been a real run-away nose down trim after take-off? Eg .. Say the pilot's nose down control column trim button got stuck? Isn't the procedure to deal with a real run away trim the same as the MCAS triggered nose down trim? Actually I'd have thought a real runaway nose down trim would be worse because it won't pause and restart so you'd have even less time to correct it.
Having said that it does seem silly to have a single AOA input as the driver when there are two that could be queried to ensure they are in approximate agreement.
[/quote]
Full nose down stabiliser cannot be overcome with elevators - look at the difference in surface area between the two. Going to take a lot of turns on the wheel to get the trim back to a semi correct location - all while the aircraft is heading down at increasing speed. You also need to think about that before you disable the stab trim. At low altitude I doubt you'd have the time.
A triple system is the way to go - 2 AOA with different inputs - which one is correct?
An even better option is to start with a brand new design instead of tweaking a 50+ year old aircraft.
Would not both of these accidents have had the same results had the problem been a real run-away nose down trim after take-off? Eg .. Say the pilot's nose down control column trim button got stuck? Isn't the procedure to deal with a real run away trim the same as the MCAS triggered nose down trim? Actually I'd have thought a real runaway nose down trim would be worse because it won't pause and restart so you'd have even less time to correct it.
Having said that it does seem silly to have a single AOA input as the driver when there are two that could be queried to ensure they are in approximate agreement.
[/quote]
Full nose down stabiliser cannot be overcome with elevators - look at the difference in surface area between the two. Going to take a lot of turns on the wheel to get the trim back to a semi correct location - all while the aircraft is heading down at increasing speed. You also need to think about that before you disable the stab trim. At low altitude I doubt you'd have the time.
A triple system is the way to go - 2 AOA with different inputs - which one is correct?
An even better option is to start with a brand new design instead of tweaking a 50+ year old aircraft.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
[quote]2 AOA with different inputs - which one is correct?[/quote]
Check the news today - BA and the FAA agree with me that MCAS
should look at both AOA and will disengage if they disagree. See
my previous comments.
For example, this one from March 18:
[img width=500 height=326][/img]
Check the news today - BA and the FAA agree with me that MCAS
should look at both AOA and will disengage if they disagree. See
my previous comments.
For example, this one from March 18:
[img width=500 height=326][/img]
Agreed, and this is standard practice in safety critical software. When you have multiple systems and one disagrees with the others it is voted out and ignored. If you have two systems that disagree the only thing you can do is disable and ask a human. Kind of redundant software 101.
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:31 am
MCAS was required for certification.
If the system is disabled then the aircraft no longer meets certification standards.
I'm not sure this 'fix' is going to be accepted quite so easily by the regulators.
They never fixed the battery problems on the 787 either - building a steel box around them with a pipe venting overboard is just laughable imho. I understand the aircraft still has a lot of electrical issues.
If the system is disabled then the aircraft no longer meets certification standards.
I'm not sure this 'fix' is going to be accepted quite so easily by the regulators.
They never fixed the battery problems on the 787 either - building a steel box around them with a pipe venting overboard is just laughable imho. I understand the aircraft still has a lot of electrical issues.
-
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:08 pm
Gee maybe Boeing should have looked a little longer at that clean sheet design,
Kind of reminds me of BBD not taking pause after the CRJ200 and saying "Is this really worth it"
How about that BRJ-X program we just shelved?
Embraer: "Hold my beer bitches."
Kind of reminds me of BBD not taking pause after the CRJ200 and saying "Is this really worth it"
How about that BRJ-X program we just shelved?
Embraer: "Hold my beer bitches."
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:58 pm
This in FlightAware Morning Aviation News & Photo Newsletter today:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/boeing-73 ... o-so-much/
https://www.zdnet.com/article/boeing-73 ... o-so-much/
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 1:34 pm
I stumbled across this in my wanderings. Just shows how fucked up the media and the propaganda announcements are. What on earth are they talking about when stated that the crew reacted correctly. Ya still need to fly the fucking aeroplane. The guy in the video comes across as having knowledge and not sure how he got the detailed recorder read outs. He was getting thumbs up from 73 max drivers in the comments.
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:04 pm
MCAS in the SIM
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 5783 Views
-
Last post by Liquid_Charlie
-
- 0 Replies
- 1609 Views
-
Last post by News
-
- 3 Replies
- 1885 Views
-
Last post by Scudrunner