Please Don't Do That
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:44 am
A cringeworthy moment.
Had the misfortune to watch a PPL try to
land the mighty C172 on a paved 4000
foot runway. His challenge was a 10
knot wind, right down the runway.
On final, I could see the nose tucked down
low, to compensate for the treacherous
headwind. First facepalm.
Despite the 10 knot headwind, he burned
the first 2000 feet of runway and instead
of overshooting, forced the mighty 172
down on the runway on it's nosewheel,
which popped the nose up, so the mains
hit, which popped the ass up, so the nose
hit again, and then the mains hit again,
and the nose hit again. Serious porpoise.
I know no one gives a shit about oscillations
but it looked just like this:
Somehow the poor 172 managed to keep
it's nosegear attached to the airframe.
Personally I would have entered a hard landing
in the journey log but he didn't. The aircraft
needs an inspection IAW CAR 625 App G( 8 ):
[quote]( 8 ) Heavy or Overweight Landings
An aircraft landing gear is designed to withstand landings at a particular aircraft weight and vertical descent velocity. If either of these parameters is exceeded during a landing, it is then probable that some damage can be caused to the landing gear or its supporting structure. Overstressing can also be caused by landing with drift or landing in an abnormal attitude (e.g. [b][i]nose or tail wheel striking the runway before the main wheels[/b][/i]). [/quote]
In particular, the rivets on the nose gear
need to be examined - they can pop right
off under shear - and the firewall for wrinkles.
But none of that legally required maintenance
will occur.
Instead, our intrepid PPL came in after his
ace landing and parked the 172 by taxiiing
off the pavement onto rough ground with
the elevator hanging down. He didn't give
a shit about the prop hitting, either. Maybe
he figured he'd completely trashed the 172
during his landing so there was no worry
about a prop strike and destroying the engine.
Now, I understand that I am a [b]BAD PERSON[/b]
because I might hurt someone's feelings by
mentioning that gee, maybe pilots shouldn't
wreck the hardware.
And the bonehead PPL is a "Good Person" because
he is having lots of "learning experiences".
And I'm ready for [u]Rui and the Four Bars[/u] (sounds
like an off-key doo-wop band from the 50's) to
start crapping all over for me, for daring to
mention this.
But please guys, try to work just a little bit on
your stick and rudder skills. The aircraft will
last a lot longer. Maybe that doesn't matter
to you but it sure as hell does to me.
I will be kind this morning and not mention
the millions of dollars spent on rwy 07/25
at CYOW because four-bars kept pulling the
same stunt, approaching high and hot and
refusing to overshoot, touching down long
and running off the end of the runway with
no thrust reversers, of course.
Had the misfortune to watch a PPL try to
land the mighty C172 on a paved 4000
foot runway. His challenge was a 10
knot wind, right down the runway.
On final, I could see the nose tucked down
low, to compensate for the treacherous
headwind. First facepalm.
Despite the 10 knot headwind, he burned
the first 2000 feet of runway and instead
of overshooting, forced the mighty 172
down on the runway on it's nosewheel,
which popped the nose up, so the mains
hit, which popped the ass up, so the nose
hit again, and then the mains hit again,
and the nose hit again. Serious porpoise.
I know no one gives a shit about oscillations
but it looked just like this:
Somehow the poor 172 managed to keep
it's nosegear attached to the airframe.
Personally I would have entered a hard landing
in the journey log but he didn't. The aircraft
needs an inspection IAW CAR 625 App G( 8 ):
[quote]( 8 ) Heavy or Overweight Landings
An aircraft landing gear is designed to withstand landings at a particular aircraft weight and vertical descent velocity. If either of these parameters is exceeded during a landing, it is then probable that some damage can be caused to the landing gear or its supporting structure. Overstressing can also be caused by landing with drift or landing in an abnormal attitude (e.g. [b][i]nose or tail wheel striking the runway before the main wheels[/b][/i]). [/quote]
In particular, the rivets on the nose gear
need to be examined - they can pop right
off under shear - and the firewall for wrinkles.
But none of that legally required maintenance
will occur.
Instead, our intrepid PPL came in after his
ace landing and parked the 172 by taxiiing
off the pavement onto rough ground with
the elevator hanging down. He didn't give
a shit about the prop hitting, either. Maybe
he figured he'd completely trashed the 172
during his landing so there was no worry
about a prop strike and destroying the engine.
Now, I understand that I am a [b]BAD PERSON[/b]
because I might hurt someone's feelings by
mentioning that gee, maybe pilots shouldn't
wreck the hardware.
And the bonehead PPL is a "Good Person" because
he is having lots of "learning experiences".
And I'm ready for [u]Rui and the Four Bars[/u] (sounds
like an off-key doo-wop band from the 50's) to
start crapping all over for me, for daring to
mention this.
But please guys, try to work just a little bit on
your stick and rudder skills. The aircraft will
last a lot longer. Maybe that doesn't matter
to you but it sure as hell does to me.
I will be kind this morning and not mention
the millions of dollars spent on rwy 07/25
at CYOW because four-bars kept pulling the
same stunt, approaching high and hot and
refusing to overshoot, touching down long
and running off the end of the runway with
no thrust reversers, of course.