Ok. What you have to keep in mind is that the
military keep having their budget cut. Their student
pilots must master a ridiculous amount of material
in a ludicrously small amount of flight time.
I remember an ex-mil standards pilot, telling me
that the poor students today, do their form eval
on their 5th formation flight, and it was really
a scary experience for him. The students tried
to kill him regularly.
So, the military must select for pilots with ridiculously
steep learning curves, and nothing else matters.
I suspect that you like to linearly extrapolate,
but that's not how life (or learning curves) work:
[img width=500 height=307]
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... nality.jpg[/img]
The above curve is nicely egalitarian but that's
rarely how life works, BTW.
Just because someone has a very steep initial
learning curve, doesn't mean that they will
necessarily end up being a more skilled pilot
in the long run.
Many times, a pilot who learns a little slower,
and is a bit more thoughtful, ends up being a
much more knowledgeable and skilled pilot.
I have only been flight instructing continuously
for a quarter of a century, so I might not know
as much about aviation as some people, but
I do know that:
1) everyone is different. People learn at different
rates, and end up with different skills, which has
nothing do with with their genetic gifts (vision, etc)
2) the earlier YOU learn to fly, the better a pilot you will be
3) the MORE you fly, the better a pilot you will be
The military think the above is nonsense. They
want to buy a handful (65) of F-35 and not fly
them. They intend that their fighter pilots become
sim wizards, because they haven't figured out that
a sim and an aircraft are different.