Flight Planning basic level
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:35 pm
I see that they had another A/C (pa28) run out of fuel. Lucky bugger made the runway in Thunder Bay. He was coming from St Andrews
I saw it so much recently with "new" pilots planning trips based on min fuel and the real reality not knowing how much fuel is in the tanks except for the initial departure. My experience has shown me that "vintage" piston light aircraft can vary in fuel burns for a large number of reasons that are subtle enough to cause grief. The obsession with tying to make the rules work and be "legal" can tip to the unsafe but perceived legal area and pilots press ignorantly on.
I must say I find no reason for someone to run out of fuel to the point of emergency but it continues to happen regularly.
In this case, if the aircraft did have 4 hours of fuel and a 100 kts it just makes the +45 minute thing a an unexpected 10 kt headwind runs him out of fuel. Why are schools hammering this shit into people's heads. Even with GPS flight planning is not fallible. I live by my tag line -- I always asked guys what was more dangerous, a few pounds extra or running out of fuel short of the runway. Seems pretty simple to me after applying today's "buzz phrase" -- "risk analysis"
I still ask the question "WHY??" jeezus I always had enough fuel to get lost, find myself and make the trip. It seems that teaching "black and white" (no racism intended, just shows you how fucked today's concept of "social media justice is ) where grey is predominant just doesn't work all the time (can that be perceived as a reference to the "south" - damn ).
Ramblings with a little drift from an old guy --
I know nothing about a PA 28 but they likely cruise around 100 kts and it's about a 3+15 minute flight. What is the endurance, I'm guess about 4 hours. That looks like a "legal" flight but right on the limit. I would be doing a tech stop for sure.Fortunately, the pilot was able to glide the aircraft onto the runway, and the plane had enough momentum to continue onto the taxiway. It was then towed to the apron.
The plane's two fuel tanks were found to be empty after an inspection.
I saw it so much recently with "new" pilots planning trips based on min fuel and the real reality not knowing how much fuel is in the tanks except for the initial departure. My experience has shown me that "vintage" piston light aircraft can vary in fuel burns for a large number of reasons that are subtle enough to cause grief. The obsession with tying to make the rules work and be "legal" can tip to the unsafe but perceived legal area and pilots press ignorantly on.
I must say I find no reason for someone to run out of fuel to the point of emergency but it continues to happen regularly.
In this case, if the aircraft did have 4 hours of fuel and a 100 kts it just makes the +45 minute thing a an unexpected 10 kt headwind runs him out of fuel. Why are schools hammering this shit into people's heads. Even with GPS flight planning is not fallible. I live by my tag line -- I always asked guys what was more dangerous, a few pounds extra or running out of fuel short of the runway. Seems pretty simple to me after applying today's "buzz phrase" -- "risk analysis"
I still ask the question "WHY??" jeezus I always had enough fuel to get lost, find myself and make the trip. It seems that teaching "black and white" (no racism intended, just shows you how fucked today's concept of "social media justice is ) where grey is predominant just doesn't work all the time (can that be perceived as a reference to the "south" - damn ).
Ramblings with a little drift from an old guy --