Page 1 of 1

Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:42 pm
by vanNostrum

Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:50 pm
by ScudRunner-d95
Accepting an intersection departure without computing the numbers on the big iron like that is foolish at best. 

That being said statistics prove rejecting a takeoff at V1 on a tight runway can be catastrophic.


Here is a textbook engine failure on the takeoff roll, I don't know how close to V1 they were but well done to the crew.

[youtube][/youtube]

RUDDER PEDALS!

Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:18 am
by Rookie Pilot
Well done?


But they must have "four bars"!! 


Doesnt that mean they suck by definition?


O0

Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:28 am
by vanNostrum
Fourteen  bars if you count the relief crew  :o

Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 4:17 pm
by Eric Janson
At my previous Airline they tried to take-off from an intersection without the appropriate performance chart.
[url=http://avherald.com/h?article=45a75ffc&opt=0]
http://avherald.com/h?article=45a75ffc&opt=0[/url]

They (just) got away with it - pictures show a very late rotation.

Company policy encouraged intersection take-offs without issuing any guidance about when not to do them.


Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 5:16 pm
by Colonel
[quote]Company policy encouraged intersection take-offs without issuing any guidance about when not to do them.[/quote]

Is it April 1st already?! 

Sorry, I don't believe the absence of micro-management.

Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:15 am
by Eric Janson
[quote author=Colonel link=topic=1288.msg5153#msg5153 date=1450027005]
[quote]Company policy encouraged intersection take-offs without issuing any guidance about when not to do them.[/quote]

Is it April 1st already?! 

Sorry, I don't believe the absence of micro-management.
[/quote]

It's Asia - learning is done by rote. [b]If it's not in the books they don't know[/b]. Most people were in management because they didn't like flying not because they were any good at their jobs (and believe me - they weren't!).

This procedure was designed to save fuel - they also introduced landing with reduced flap at the same time (again no guidance).

I met up with the team who did the IOSA audit in 2012 (one of them is a friend) and their telling comment:- [b]"They don't know what they don't know"


[/b]