They (just) got away with it - pictures show a very late rotation.
Company policy encouraged intersection take-offs without issuing any guidance about when not to do them.
Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 5:16 pm
by Colonel
[quote]Company policy encouraged intersection take-offs without issuing any guidance about when not to do them.[/quote]
Is it April 1st already?!
Sorry, I don't believe the absence of micro-management.
Re: Preliminary Report 777 strike runway lights MIA
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:15 am
by Eric Janson
[quote author=Colonel link=topic=1288.msg5153#msg5153 date=1450027005]
[quote]Company policy encouraged intersection take-offs without issuing any guidance about when not to do them.[/quote]
Is it April 1st already?!
Sorry, I don't believe the absence of micro-management.
[/quote]
It's Asia - learning is done by rote. [b]If it's not in the books they don't know[/b]. Most people were in management because they didn't like flying not because they were any good at their jobs (and believe me - they weren't!).
This procedure was designed to save fuel - they also introduced landing with reduced flap at the same time (again no guidance).
I met up with the team who did the IOSA audit in 2012 (one of them is a friend) and their telling comment:- [b]"They don't know what they don't know"