[url=http://nationalpost.com/news/canadas-cf ... -phased-in]http://nationalpost.com/news/canadas-cf ... -phased-in[/url]
[quote]Companies who took part in an industry day outlining government plans were told
the [b]jets, dating from 1982, will be retired after 50 years[/b] of service[/quote]
Insane. Pilots will be flying tactical airplanes [b]twice their age[/b].
Oh, Canada.
Ironic note: the guy responsible for the amazing and long-lasting
F-15 / F-16 / F-18 would surely be deeply hated instead of feted
by the bureaucrats if he visited Ottawa today.
[url=https://duotechservices.com/10-things-y ... -john-boyd]https://duotechservices.com/10-things-y ... -john-boyd[/url]
[quote][b]He Helped Plan Desert Storm, Saved the F-15, a Famous Fighter Pilot…But You’ve Never Heard of Him[/b]
Boyd formed a small advocacy group within Headquarters USAF that dubbed itself the “Fighter Mafiaâ€.
Using his E-M Theory, Boyd spurred the USAF to explore a lightweight fighter (LFW) program.
This led to the development of the YF-16, which would become the USAF [b]F-16[/b] Fighting Falcon,
and the YF-17, which would become the Navy’s [b]F-18[/b] Hornet.[/quote]
[b]You're Welcome[/b]
50 Years of F-18's?!!
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:46 pm
Agreed, we should also buy a bunch of F-16s and A-10s.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
The USAF always hated the A-10. They tried to kill
it since the day they started taking delivery of them.
The only reason the USAF built the A-10 was to stop
the money falling into enemy hands - you know, the
navy and the army.
I would have loved to fly an A-10. Down low, pulling
lots of G with the biggest gun around. Heaven!!
it since the day they started taking delivery of them.
The only reason the USAF built the A-10 was to stop
the money falling into enemy hands - you know, the
navy and the army.
I would have loved to fly an A-10. Down low, pulling
lots of G with the biggest gun around. Heaven!!
-
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 6:46 pm
[quote author=mcrit link=topic=7858.msg21781#msg21781 date=1517271190]
Why should the fighter guys have it any better than the Sea King guys?
[/quote]
Or the B-52 guys?
Why should the fighter guys have it any better than the Sea King guys?
[/quote]
Or the B-52 guys?
[quote author=Colonel Sanders link=topic=7858.msg21783#msg21783 date=1517272548]
The USAF always hated the A-10. They tried to kill
it since the day they started taking delivery of them.
The only reason the USAF built the A-10 was to stop
the money falling into enemy hands - you know, the
navy and the army.
I would have loved to fly an A-10. Down low, pulling
lots of G with the biggest gun around. Heaven!!
[/quote]
The A-10's dropped a metric shit ton/hour on Mosul.
Hearing them check-in with the TAC-P, and listening to the 9-lines. Awesome!
"(A10 callsign) SPLASH!"
Loved it!
You're right, the MotherFucking USAF is a jealous school child when it comes to aircraft procurement. The C27J project is the perfect example.
The USAF always hated the A-10. They tried to kill
it since the day they started taking delivery of them.
The only reason the USAF built the A-10 was to stop
the money falling into enemy hands - you know, the
navy and the army.
I would have loved to fly an A-10. Down low, pulling
lots of G with the biggest gun around. Heaven!!
[/quote]
The A-10's dropped a metric shit ton/hour on Mosul.
Hearing them check-in with the TAC-P, and listening to the 9-lines. Awesome!
"(A10 callsign) SPLASH!"
Loved it!
You're right, the MotherFucking USAF is a jealous school child when it comes to aircraft procurement. The C27J project is the perfect example.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 3158 Views
-
Last post by Colonel
-
- 1 Replies
- 1154 Views
-
Last post by Rosco P Coltrane
-
- 1 Replies
- 2216 Views
-
Last post by Scudrunner