Re: C-FBWH
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:03 pm
The thing I found interesting about that anaylsis was the possibility of automatic gear extension. That would suck.
The injection issue also. Friend of mine, many years ago was ferrying a spanky new 185 to its new home from the factory. Had about 1400 hrs on his old 180 and routinely blew a tank on long flights. Long story short, flying along at about 1000 feet agl he blew a tank on the 185 and things didnt work out well .
It never hurts when one gets on a new to them type to get some advice or instruction from someone with experience on type.
Being almost 40 years since I instucted but the 5 hours for Ppl and 5 for the night rating at thetime, were very limited in the objectives. 250 hr, 21 yeat old instructors are not always the best choice to let determine training objectives.
The injection issue also. Friend of mine, many years ago was ferrying a spanky new 185 to its new home from the factory. Had about 1400 hrs on his old 180 and routinely blew a tank on long flights. Long story short, flying along at about 1000 feet agl he blew a tank on the 185 and things didnt work out well .
It never hurts when one gets on a new to them type to get some advice or instruction from someone with experience on type.
Being almost 40 years since I instucted but the 5 hours for Ppl and 5 for the night rating at thetime, were very limited in the objectives. 250 hr, 21 yeat old instructors are not always the best choice to let determine training objectives.