Page 2 of 2
Re: Washington state to ban 100LL
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 1:36 pm
by Slick Goodlin
I hope 94UL comes my way. I look forward to ending the days of cleaning lead off my spark plugs hiring someone licensed to clean lead off my spark plugs.
Re: Washington state to ban 100LL
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 1:46 pm
by Nark
Careful what you wish for:
15D5C17F-FBE0-403F-9E80-A6D324D953B5.jpeg
If you knowingly walk in to sodomy of your wallet is it an ass-raping at the pump?
Re: Washington state to ban 100LL
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:57 pm
by David MacRay
Almost time to pull a Diemert style “world class restoration”.
Maybe find a cheap 1976 VW rabbit with a rebuilt diesel engine, sneak it into a cub clone and run it off used oil from the local chippy.
Probably want to get some sort of a gear drive so you don’t harm the main bearings.
Re: Washington state to ban 100LL
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2023 5:47 pm
by Slick Goodlin
Nark wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 1:46 pm
Careful what you wish for
Oof. My fault for assuming the price would be closer to premium mogas, I guess.
Re: Washington state to ban 100LL
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2023 7:02 pm
by Nark
I did a cost benefit of buying a transfer tank and pump and throwing it my truck.
Eventually did it a few months ago. Just filled 100gallons @ 3.89/gal vs $4.50 the airport over yonder.
I did some fuzzy math, and if I recall I need to fly 80 hours to break even. Everything after is $$$ savings.
Re: Washington state to ban 100LL
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2023 12:08 pm
by Colonel
From an engineering standpoint 94UL ought to significantly cheaper than 100LL because it has no nasty lead.
I thought it was 100LL before the lead was sdded. I don’t jniw why it costs more to get less.