Oh yeah. I've logged PIC (see the journey log, and wrenched)
on a DH 87 Hornet Moth. Only three in North America, and not
many of those fly. Here's my buddy Larry:
[img width=500 height=363][/img]
Whitworth hardware and a fully swivelling tailwheel and
folding wings. Pre-war cabin biplane. Designed to be flown off
a large square grass field always into wind. Larry was a good
enough stick to fly it off pavement with a crosswind - with a
swivelling tailwheel. Maybe 10 pilots in Canada with that much
stick & rudder skill. Maybe not. Perhaps 8 now that Eric and I
have been disenfranchised by TC. Still looking for that authority
in the Aeronautics Act.
Go to your local FTU and ask about Whitworth hardware and a
checkout on a Hornet Moth and a Royal Gull.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_S ... _Whitworth
Relatively rare airplanes.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
It sure as hell didn't used to be a rare airplane, but one
airplane I really enjoyed checking myself out on, was the
(450hp R-985) Stearman. Inverted systems! Smoke!
[img width=500 height=362][/img]
A big old biplane. Built like a tank. A very rare sight these days.
airplane I really enjoyed checking myself out on, was the
(450hp R-985) Stearman. Inverted systems! Smoke!
[img width=500 height=362][/img]
A big old biplane. Built like a tank. A very rare sight these days.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
On the subject of airplanes that didn't used to be rare ...
Harvard / T-6 / SNJ
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
This one was weird. Wings were clipped, ailerons snatched. Huge
geared 3-bladed prop with all the gyroscopic precession that you
can imagine, and more boost than the jugs could take. Short zoomies
made it LOUD without prop tip noise. P-51 retractable tailwheel and
virtually no prop tip-to-ground clearance during a wheel landing, esp
with compressed main gear. Too many mods to list.
Everyone was scared of it, but I loved it. Checked myself out in it,
flew surface acro in it, first flight. Hammerhead was interesting.
Harvard / T-6 / SNJ
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
This one was weird. Wings were clipped, ailerons snatched. Huge
geared 3-bladed prop with all the gyroscopic precession that you
can imagine, and more boost than the jugs could take. Short zoomies
made it LOUD without prop tip noise. P-51 retractable tailwheel and
virtually no prop tip-to-ground clearance during a wheel landing, esp
with compressed main gear. Too many mods to list.
Everyone was scared of it, but I loved it. Checked myself out in it,
flew surface acro in it, first flight. Hammerhead was interesting.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
Another example of an aircraft that sure as hell didn't used to
be rare, but you never see any more:
[img width=500 height=333]https://generalaviationnews.com/wp-cont ... e-ramp.jpg[/img]
I actually didn't much like how the P-51D (TF-51) flew. Heavy
ailerons at speed - needed servo tabs. Bled airspeed badly when
you put the G on - fast, but not a turning machine. Needed work
on the wingtips!
It was so under-developed, I couldn't believe it was a "D" model.
What the hell had they been working on, for the A/B/C?! One
flight, and I noticed those two serious flaws, both of which as a
really stupid fucking engineer (compared to all the self-proclaimed
genius princesses in Canadian aviation) I could immediately
propose fixes for.
You should never meet your heroes.
be rare, but you never see any more:
[img width=500 height=333]https://generalaviationnews.com/wp-cont ... e-ramp.jpg[/img]
I actually didn't much like how the P-51D (TF-51) flew. Heavy
ailerons at speed - needed servo tabs. Bled airspeed badly when
you put the G on - fast, but not a turning machine. Needed work
on the wingtips!
It was so under-developed, I couldn't believe it was a "D" model.
What the hell had they been working on, for the A/B/C?! One
flight, and I noticed those two serious flaws, both of which as a
really stupid fucking engineer (compared to all the self-proclaimed
genius princesses in Canadian aviation) I could immediately
propose fixes for.
You should never meet your heroes.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
Rare in Canada (4 or 5 C-registered?) but common as water everywhere
else in the world:
[img width=500 height=332][/img]
Nice airplane, but the spool-up will kill you. Ask the guy who
crashed a T-33 800 feet short of an 8000 foot runway at Hamilton -
TC thought he was a GREAT stick and wouldn't give FernV a type
rating on it. What the fuck ....
else in the world:
[img width=500 height=332][/img]
Nice airplane, but the spool-up will kill you. Ask the guy who
crashed a T-33 800 feet short of an 8000 foot runway at Hamilton -
TC thought he was a GREAT stick and wouldn't give FernV a type
rating on it. What the fuck ....
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
T-bone. Don't see many on the ramp these days.
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
Not many left. Geared engines. Everyone but me hates them.
They sound orgasmic and have a solid feel. Was never a fan
of the piano keys though. Great fun during the usual self-checkout.
[img width=500 height=332][/img]
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
Not many left. Geared engines. Everyone but me hates them.
They sound orgasmic and have a solid feel. Was never a fan
of the piano keys though. Great fun during the usual self-checkout.
[img width=500 height=332][/img]
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
Not sure this counts as rare or not:
[img width=500 height=302][/img]
First Lancair III that flew in Canada. Speedy but IMHO had
pretty demanding flight characteristics, esp without the wingtips.
I would recommend both jet and taildragger experience for
anyone that wants to fly one. Most people would shit their pants
if they ever stalled it. NLF wing reminded me a lot of the P-51 stall.
I never bothered getting dual or a type rating. This one
overheated every time I took off - I was always redesigning
the oil cooler outlet to try to get more pressure differential
across it, but remember I'm pretty stupid compared to a
Canadian pilot.
[img width=500 height=302][/img]
First Lancair III that flew in Canada. Speedy but IMHO had
pretty demanding flight characteristics, esp without the wingtips.
I would recommend both jet and taildragger experience for
anyone that wants to fly one. Most people would shit their pants
if they ever stalled it. NLF wing reminded me a lot of the P-51 stall.
I never bothered getting dual or a type rating. This one
overheated every time I took off - I was always redesigning
the oil cooler outlet to try to get more pressure differential
across it, but remember I'm pretty stupid compared to a
Canadian pilot.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
Enough with the airplane pictures. How about some food?
[img width=455 height=500][/img]
I like this kind of rare:
[img width=281 height=500][/img]
[img width=457 height=500][/img]
[img width=500 height=410][/img]
[img width=375 height=500][/img]
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
[img width=375 height=500][/img]
[img width=375 height=500][/img]
Here's a rare Delorean I drove past at 88 MPH. It
was a bit tricky to get the photo:
[img width=500 height=374][/img]
Oh, all right. Something on topic. Ok, here's what a Lycoming
looks like after you let it sit for a year. Owner told me he had so
much money, he didn't care about the trashed 540. Must be nice
to be a rich Canadian:
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
One-wheel crosswind landing fun in a taildragger:
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
I probably shouldn't post so many pictures, and I probably wouldn't,
except airline pilots are apparently irritated by them. So ....
[img width=455 height=500][/img]
I like this kind of rare:
[img width=281 height=500][/img]
[img width=457 height=500][/img]
[img width=500 height=410][/img]
[img width=375 height=500][/img]
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
[img width=375 height=500][/img]
[img width=375 height=500][/img]
Here's a rare Delorean I drove past at 88 MPH. It
was a bit tricky to get the photo:
[img width=500 height=374][/img]
Oh, all right. Something on topic. Ok, here's what a Lycoming
looks like after you let it sit for a year. Owner told me he had so
much money, he didn't care about the trashed 540. Must be nice
to be a rich Canadian:
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
One-wheel crosswind landing fun in a taildragger:
[img width=500 height=375][/img]
I probably shouldn't post so many pictures, and I probably wouldn't,
except airline pilots are apparently irritated by them. So ....
[quote]. Did you fly the Anson JAW Chuck? [/quote]
I can't remember, the Ansons I flew in 1966 were owned by Austin Airways they had four of them flying mag. work.
[quote]The Turbo Goose is what I would consider rare. The total production of the Goose ,Mallard and Widgeon didn’t total much over 700. BCI was a great machine. [/quote]
Yes BCI was a real nice machine did you fly it for Air West Airlines?
I can't remember, the Ansons I flew in 1966 were owned by Austin Airways they had four of them flying mag. work.
[quote]The Turbo Goose is what I would consider rare. The total production of the Goose ,Mallard and Widgeon didn’t total much over 700. BCI was a great machine. [/quote]
Yes BCI was a real nice machine did you fly it for Air West Airlines?
I don't know if the Sea Bee is considered rare but it was my first flying boat flying (1954 to 1957 ).
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 10 Replies
- 11786 Views
-
Last post by David MacRay
-
- 23 Replies
- 6308 Views
-
Last post by Chuck Ellsworth
-
- 211 Replies
- 43192 Views
-
Last post by Slick Goodlin