When I was a kid, I read all the books. The super-pilots could jump into a
type they hadn't flown before, and off they'd go.
I'm not one of those people. I just bang bits for a living.
But sometime, you owe it to yourself to read Bob Hoover's Autobiography. He
signed my copy for me, at OSH, which means an awful lot to me. He escaped
from a prison camp in WWII by jumping into a German airplane and flying off in it.
Much later, Bob jumped into an aerobatic airplane at a Russian WAC that he had
never flown before, and did surface acro in it. Only Yuri Gagarin was able to rescue
him from the enraged bureaucrats, which I sympathized with. Bob thought my friend
Freddy put on an awesome P-51 aerobatic display at OSH.
I digress. Bob is a God amongst men. A real hero, and the best pilot I ever met.
You can see why the bureaucrats hated him so deeply.
Back to my world. Many times, I have ended up checking myself out in new, strange
types because no one would fly them. All the hot-air types scatter like cockroaches when
the lights come on. Few are up for the moment. Blowhard cowards.
One fun airplane I checked myself out on was the Piaggio Royal Gull, which was an
Italian twin pusher geared amphib flying boat taildragger. I am not making this up.
Not many left. One was left in Canada, when the owner left permanently with the
babysitter for Belize, enraging the wife more than you will ever know. I thought it
was a grand idea to fly it there, but it was broken. First, we had to fix it, then I had
to fly it, and the local FTU didn't have an instructor with time on type, which I found
surprising.
Aren't you supposed to get a dual checkout on a new type?
Anyways, it was uneventful. A bit of a trick sorting out the trims to get it to fly straight,
felt like a Seabee. I think it was out of C of G with a pilot and full gas. Bizarre. I loved it.
Another time, my friend Freddy delivered a PT-22 Ryan to Geneseo, NY and we proceeded
to Rochester where he got drunk in a bar and proceeded to talk smack about Jimmy Buffett
to the locals. Totally drunk, I helped him stagger to his hotel room. Along the way, Freddy
stopped and scooped up some leftover food with his fingers from a room service tray outside
a room in the hallway. When I remarked that might not be the best choice, he observed that
I had never spent time in a Mexican prison, and if I had, I would be more grateful for free food.
I had no response for that. Anyways, next day, still drunk we poured him on an airliner for
Key West and back I went to Geneseo to fly a PT-22 Ryan solo for the first time. No
checkout for me.
I had no idea what I was doing. It had a weird Kinner radial engine with a very
lame starter. I had no idea how much fuel it burned, or how fast it cruised, or how
far to fly for my first leg. Anyways, I made friends with it, and got it on my ICAS
card. Needless to say, there was no one to teach me to fly acro in it. I think I'm
the only airshow pilot in North America with that type on my card. Doing surface
acro in a PT-22 Ryan is a bit like taking your grandmother to a gang-bang, though,
despite it's ridiculous Vne. Some more reading:
https://sofrep.com/fightersweep/ryan-pt ... it-killer/
http://www.airbum.com/pireps/PirepPT-22.html
Another time, a clip-wing Harvard shows up at my airport. No dual for me. Really
fucking weird airplane. One of a kind. Nothing like a stock T-6/SNJ/Harvard.
Geared R-1340 with enormous 3-blade metal prop. Zoomies. P-51 tailwheel.
Had aileron snatch, which oddly bothered people. I loved it. What a tank. Surface
acro, first flight.
Another airplane, no dual for me. Stearman with 450hp R-985 with inverted fuel
and oil, which is pretty fucking cool.
Checked myself out, rolls and loops on the first flight on downwind, which I thought
was being pretty conservative. I love biplanes. Taildragger, fabric, radial engine. Heaven.
Beech 18. Very nasty reputation. Fucking fire-breathing dragon.
Again, no checkout. Lots of really scary shit about it being a fire-breathing dragon.
Insane for your first flight to be a solo checkout, so that's what I did, after some
prodding from Chuck.
As usual, all the aviation experts were full of shit. Lovely airplane. Awesome sound.
Wrote a note about it on my website to try to help the next guy. It was all about the
gyroscopic pitch-yaw coupling. 3 metal blade props. Locking tailwheel.
Speaking of locking tailwheels, many variants of Pitts S-1. Dunno how the experts
get dual in a single-seat airplane. Very different from the two-seats.
Oh yeah, the PT-19 fairchild.
Of course I checked myself out in it. Lovely airplane. Gentle, like a cow. Weighs
a ton, wonderfully smooth inverted inline 6 ranger engine, woefully underpowered,
but a wood prop so no pitch-yaw coupling. Bueno. Eric taught himself aerobatics
in it. He figured out that you needed to get the nose really high. Smart kid. One
day, I was giving dual to an aerobatic instructor candidate in a Decathlon and I see
him taxi out in an RV-8, checking himself out solo - he had never flown any RV before -
and taught himself aerobatics in it.
You can see why TC thinks my family are such shitty pilots.
Twin Bonanza, which has absolutely nothing to do with the Beech Bonanza. Much
bigger. Father of the Queenair, and the Kingair.
Lots of useless garbage about it being a fire-breathing dragon. You know, geared
engines, etc. It showed up, the ferry pilot disappeared and of course, solo checkout.
Right engine peed fuel on the ground and mechanics ran screaming and wouldn't
touch it because it was GEARED so I had to fix it. Then, flew it. Marvellous airplane,
with that solid Beechcraft feel. Sounded better than a P-51 with those two geared
engines. Really.
Too many homebuilts to list, that I did checked myself out in, so I could give dual
on them. In addition to the usual RV's, Sonerai, Sonex, etc. Can't remember them
all. You can see why TC won't let me renew my instructor ratings - someone that
does that for decades with a perfect safety record MUST BE STOPPED before
competence is developed in the pilot pool. TC doesn't give a shit about safety -
TC is all about CONTROL.
Another homebuilt I checked myself out in: Glasair III
There was a guy, Paul H-something? that used to beat the shit out of one at OSH.
All these old guys - including Stan in the hangar across from me - bought one, thinking
that if they built one, they could fly just like him.
No.
Anyways, I rather like the Glasair III despite it's really delicate hydraulic system for the
gear. It was fast, with a NLF wing, and like the P-51D that I flew, had interesting stall
characteristics. See the dropoff in the Cl curve after CLmax. Like all homebuilts, though,
it was fucked up. Oil temperature soared in flight with anything less than idle power, so
I had to engineer an aluminum vent to suck air out of the oil cooler, mounted on the side
of the cowl. It was funny on final - it would fishtail because of it's tiny vertical fin. Oddly,
one of the best natural sticks I have ever met - Bob - got behind it on final. Surprising, for
an expert tailwheel and helicopter pilot.
Another completely demented homebuilt I test flew and gave dual on, was a Piper cub
variant with a Mazda rotary 13B engine. Not sure if you remember, but during the 70's
and 80's and 90's all sorts of @ssholes were telling us that composite homebuilt aircraft
with car engines were "the wave of the future". No one has noticed since that Vans
has crushed the homebuilt market, using an aluminum airframe with a Lycoming, that
you could have actually built in 1950. So much for sideburns in the desert, and Porsche's
replacement for the Lycoming 360, which you have probably never heard of, that they
spent hundreds of millions of dollars on German engineering which completely failed,
compared to a simple, American-designed air-cooled opposed Lycoming which is still in
production, many decades after it's debut.
The chief test pilot of the NRC once asked me how I got the gig as the local L39
IP / type rating check pilot, despite not being ex-military. I told him,
[size=12pt]"An airplane has wings, that push air down. And an engine, that pushes air back.
There are some systems associated with the production of lift and thrust, but
nothing terribly complicated"[/size]
Do remember that I just bang bits for a living. I only fly part-time, because it amuses me.
So you have absolutely no excuse to not fly a whole fucking lot better than I do, if you pay the
mortgage with a flying gig. Think about that.
Checking Yourself Out In New Types
-
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 6:46 pm
Good timing, I was just coming on to ask about self-checkouts in little, single seat homebuilts. Last one I did was a whole lot sloppier on takeoff than I would have liked, any suggestions?
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
How to stay alive, doing self-checkouts:
1) systems knowledge. How does the fuel system work? Does it work
at all? Venting? Vapor lock? Have you done a flow test? Do you even know
what a flow test is? How do the flaps and gear work? You've got to learn to
PRIORITIZE and make sure that the important stuff works. Lots of unimportant
stuff - radios, flight instruments - can be broken on an airplane, and it will fly just
fine, but the fuel's gotta flow and the gear's gotta go up and down.
[img][/img]
2) stick and rudder basics. You must be tightly closed loop. I remember reading
about a WWII test pilot in England at Castle Bromwich (?) that blew everyone away
by testing flying [i]both[/i] Spitfires and Lancasters. No one could understand how he did
it, and as a pre-war virtuoso pilot, he probably didn't, either. Alex Henshaw, that was
his name, test flew over 2,000 new Spitfires:
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/n ... t-11007220
[quote]they produced more than 11,000 Spitfires, over a fifth of which were tested by Alex –
who also flew many of the 300 Lancasters completed at Castle Bromwich.[/quote]
Be an expert on PIO and know how to instantly recognize it and stop it. One of the best
pilots I have ever flown with, was a master at controlling pitch just shy of the negative CLmax
throughout extreme pitch attitude, G and airspeed changes. Fucking masterful. Rob Holland
territory.
3) some engineering theory. Pitch-yaw coupling with metal blade props and taildraggers
is something I run across all the time, and no golden arm pilot in Canada has [i]ever[/i] mentioned
it to me, in the last 50 fucking years. For surface acro, you need to know about top gate
and subtending velocity vectors. Look at the wing loading, which will tell you about the
runway requirements, and the wing profile, which will tell you about the Cl curve. Pilots
don't give a shit about the Cl curve, but how fast it falls after Clmax is very interesting to
me. Power loading. Will tell you how well it will climb, and has nothing to do with cruise
speed, which is almost entirely determined by drag. Ask Roy LoPresti. Nice guy.
4) some mechanical skill. Even for certified aircraft, you had better be able to do a
good walkaround before your first flight. I remember I was asked to do some instruction
on a weird, rare two-seat Maule, of a model I had never flown before. No biggie. It was
fresh out of annual, which should scare the living shit out of you. Sure enough, the ASI
was reading 20+ parked in the hangar, so it was unserviceable, and the stall warning
indicator tab on the wing was broken off, so that was U/S, and the tailwheel wouldn't
stay in the detent, so it was going to be a real handful taxiing and landing. Taildraggers
need a lot of fussing with the tailwheel, and it's generally flithy with worn springs - both
kind - and opening clips.
5) flying similar aircraft helps a whole lot. Airplanes make funny shudders and have odd
vibrations, and it's up to you to figure out what they are, and if they are divergent. I have
spent an awful lot of time and effort over the decades over this. It pissed me off, when I
started flying turbine, and I had the same problem. Fuuck!
Note about stall warning indicators. The bureaucrats have made it so difficult, a certified
stall warning switch is USD$3000. No typo. One for a homebuilt is US$60. The paper
pushers must be so happy, that they have decreased the level of safety and tried to ground
perfectly serviceable aircraft that will never, ever be flown part 121 or even 135. If you put
that perfectly functional $60 stall warning switch on your certified aircraft, the paperpushers
will vengefully fuck you up for life. That's why you pay big, big income taxes, to pay for their
defined benefits.
1) systems knowledge. How does the fuel system work? Does it work
at all? Venting? Vapor lock? Have you done a flow test? Do you even know
what a flow test is? How do the flaps and gear work? You've got to learn to
PRIORITIZE and make sure that the important stuff works. Lots of unimportant
stuff - radios, flight instruments - can be broken on an airplane, and it will fly just
fine, but the fuel's gotta flow and the gear's gotta go up and down.
[img][/img]
2) stick and rudder basics. You must be tightly closed loop. I remember reading
about a WWII test pilot in England at Castle Bromwich (?) that blew everyone away
by testing flying [i]both[/i] Spitfires and Lancasters. No one could understand how he did
it, and as a pre-war virtuoso pilot, he probably didn't, either. Alex Henshaw, that was
his name, test flew over 2,000 new Spitfires:
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/n ... t-11007220
[quote]they produced more than 11,000 Spitfires, over a fifth of which were tested by Alex –
who also flew many of the 300 Lancasters completed at Castle Bromwich.[/quote]
Be an expert on PIO and know how to instantly recognize it and stop it. One of the best
pilots I have ever flown with, was a master at controlling pitch just shy of the negative CLmax
throughout extreme pitch attitude, G and airspeed changes. Fucking masterful. Rob Holland
territory.
3) some engineering theory. Pitch-yaw coupling with metal blade props and taildraggers
is something I run across all the time, and no golden arm pilot in Canada has [i]ever[/i] mentioned
it to me, in the last 50 fucking years. For surface acro, you need to know about top gate
and subtending velocity vectors. Look at the wing loading, which will tell you about the
runway requirements, and the wing profile, which will tell you about the Cl curve. Pilots
don't give a shit about the Cl curve, but how fast it falls after Clmax is very interesting to
me. Power loading. Will tell you how well it will climb, and has nothing to do with cruise
speed, which is almost entirely determined by drag. Ask Roy LoPresti. Nice guy.
4) some mechanical skill. Even for certified aircraft, you had better be able to do a
good walkaround before your first flight. I remember I was asked to do some instruction
on a weird, rare two-seat Maule, of a model I had never flown before. No biggie. It was
fresh out of annual, which should scare the living shit out of you. Sure enough, the ASI
was reading 20+ parked in the hangar, so it was unserviceable, and the stall warning
indicator tab on the wing was broken off, so that was U/S, and the tailwheel wouldn't
stay in the detent, so it was going to be a real handful taxiing and landing. Taildraggers
need a lot of fussing with the tailwheel, and it's generally flithy with worn springs - both
kind - and opening clips.
5) flying similar aircraft helps a whole lot. Airplanes make funny shudders and have odd
vibrations, and it's up to you to figure out what they are, and if they are divergent. I have
spent an awful lot of time and effort over the decades over this. It pissed me off, when I
started flying turbine, and I had the same problem. Fuuck!
Note about stall warning indicators. The bureaucrats have made it so difficult, a certified
stall warning switch is USD$3000. No typo. One for a homebuilt is US$60. The paper
pushers must be so happy, that they have decreased the level of safety and tried to ground
perfectly serviceable aircraft that will never, ever be flown part 121 or even 135. If you put
that perfectly functional $60 stall warning switch on your certified aircraft, the paperpushers
will vengefully fuck you up for life. That's why you pay big, big income taxes, to pay for their
defined benefits.
-
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:00 pm
Always have a plan B. If you need the new chicken sandwich on the same day they roll it out, know where at least three Popeyes locations are.
Just having a pistol won't ensure they have a sandwich.
Just having a pistol won't ensure they have a sandwich.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
Personally I have never had any problem flying any airplane whether I have flown that type before or not.
Pitch, yaw and roll look exactly the same in any flying machine fixed or rotary wing. And power does exactly the same in any machine.
I use the controls to produce and control those movements and the fucking things do what I want them to do.
Pitch, yaw and roll look exactly the same in any flying machine fixed or rotary wing. And power does exactly the same in any machine.
I use the controls to produce and control those movements and the fucking things do what I want them to do.
I'd be happy to check myself out in whatever airplane you have sitting in your hangar.
Access to airplanes with an owner and an insurance company that would let you self check out in them, seems to be the hardest factor in the whole process.
Access to airplanes with an owner and an insurance company that would let you self check out in them, seems to be the hardest factor in the whole process.
-
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:31 am
Credibility with aircraft owners and insurance companies has never been a problem for me.
Generally - and incredibly - flight instructors are covered as "open pilot" on most policies.
I remember a few years back, being at an airshow down south, and an aircraft owner
asked me if I would fly his beautiful new airplane in the show. So I did. I didn't beat it
up - no gyroscopics - but I think I did a pretty nice aerobatic sequence for the crowd in
an unfamiliar airplane.
I will never have 10% of the skill of Bob Hoover or Rob Holland ... and TC and the four bars
think I'm a shit pilot compared to them ... but I have fun.
Generally - and incredibly - flight instructors are covered as "open pilot" on most policies.
I remember a few years back, being at an airshow down south, and an aircraft owner
asked me if I would fly his beautiful new airplane in the show. So I did. I didn't beat it
up - no gyroscopics - but I think I did a pretty nice aerobatic sequence for the crowd in
an unfamiliar airplane.
I will never have 10% of the skill of Bob Hoover or Rob Holland ... and TC and the four bars
think I'm a shit pilot compared to them ... but I have fun.
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:31 am
Perhaps not quite the same but it is possible to do all your training in the Simulator (including circuits). Your first flight in the actual aircraft will be a revenue flight with paying passengers.
I've done this twice - B767-300 and A340-300.
767 shares a common cockpit with the 757 but is a completely different aircraft.
A340-300 has the airbus common cockpit and flies very much like all the other airbus fly-by-wire aircraft. My second take-off was at Maximum Take-off Weight on a hot day. We had 2 engines exceed EGT limits on the Take-off roll. A bit disconcerting to rotate where the centreline lights turn alternating red and white and to see only red centreline lights when you lift off but you get used to that. Same with the slow climb rate.
I've done this twice - B767-300 and A340-300.
767 shares a common cockpit with the 757 but is a completely different aircraft.
A340-300 has the airbus common cockpit and flies very much like all the other airbus fly-by-wire aircraft. My second take-off was at Maximum Take-off Weight on a hot day. We had 2 engines exceed EGT limits on the Take-off roll. A bit disconcerting to rotate where the centreline lights turn alternating red and white and to see only red centreline lights when you lift off but you get used to that. Same with the slow climb rate.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 7 Replies
- 3305 Views
-
Last post by David MacRay
-
- 12 Replies
- 3049 Views
-
Last post by Chuck Ellsworth
-
- 0 Replies
- 1109 Views
-
Last post by Scudrunner