Lots of things are easy if you know what you’re doing. On the other hand, making stuff up in the name of looking cool qualifies as a dumb thing.
Re: Crash N Go
Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 10:53 pm
by Colonel
I get your point but on a scale of 1 to 10 on the technique-intensive scale, a roll with no altitude loss doesn’t even rate a one.
Lots of speed, pull up, neutralize, full aileron until it’s blue at the top again and pull level. Max +2G.
I taught my 9 year old daughter to roll an airplane in 90 seconds, and my family is considered pretty dense by Canadian standards. Can the self-proclaimed aviation geniuses try real hard, and fly as well as a 9 year old girl?
I don’t get it. My son on my wing. He's kind of bored.
Re: Crash N Go
Posted: Tue May 14, 2024 1:57 pm
by Colonel
Here's a roll from the surface at 400 mph in the L39.
That's easier than putting on my pants in the morning. No one taught that to me. I didn't go
on a two week course to FlightSafety to learn how to do that in a sim. It's bloody simple,
and as I pointed out above, I'm pretty stupid compared to Canadian pilots, so what's the problem?