Flight Instructor Qualifications
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:16 am
I've said it before, I'll say it again:
Civilian CPL's with 250TT should not be instructing. I don't care how nurturing and caring their FTU CFI is.
Reality is, CFI's probably off flying charters anyways, and phoning it in. He'll be gone next month.
If I was making the rules, you would need 1000TT to get a class 4 instructor rating. I would prefer 2000TT
and an ATPL for class 4, but we can't all get blowjobs every morning to wake us up, either.
This would do three things:
1) instructors would know a lot more about flying. A 1000TT pilot knows a fuck of a lot more about aviation
than a 250TT pilot. No one can dispute that.
2) flight instruction would no longer be a stepping stone to airline flying. If you have 1000TT, you can get a
job elsewhere - you don't have to instruct.
3) flight instructor wages would increase above the poverty level. FTU's would now have to compete with
703/4. I think $100,000/yr is a reasonable salary for a full-time instructor: 2000 hours per year (combined
flight and ground time, 40 hours/week) is only $50/hour.
This would vastly increase the quality of flight instruction. Yes, it would make it more expensive. I don't
see anyone complaining about USD$2500 for a fucking certified stall warning switch. It's not like Canadians
give a flying fuck at a donut about money anyways. Shut down the oil industry, shut down the rails. Ok,
I get it. Canadians don't like money. So, it shouldn't matter if flight instructors are paid the same as yoga
instructors.
Summary:
1000TT for a class 4 instructor rating
2000TT & ATPL for CFI (class 1 or 2)
Canadians don't like money
Civilian CPL's with 250TT should not be instructing. I don't care how nurturing and caring their FTU CFI is.
Reality is, CFI's probably off flying charters anyways, and phoning it in. He'll be gone next month.
If I was making the rules, you would need 1000TT to get a class 4 instructor rating. I would prefer 2000TT
and an ATPL for class 4, but we can't all get blowjobs every morning to wake us up, either.
This would do three things:
1) instructors would know a lot more about flying. A 1000TT pilot knows a fuck of a lot more about aviation
than a 250TT pilot. No one can dispute that.
2) flight instruction would no longer be a stepping stone to airline flying. If you have 1000TT, you can get a
job elsewhere - you don't have to instruct.
3) flight instructor wages would increase above the poverty level. FTU's would now have to compete with
703/4. I think $100,000/yr is a reasonable salary for a full-time instructor: 2000 hours per year (combined
flight and ground time, 40 hours/week) is only $50/hour.
This would vastly increase the quality of flight instruction. Yes, it would make it more expensive. I don't
see anyone complaining about USD$2500 for a fucking certified stall warning switch. It's not like Canadians
give a flying fuck at a donut about money anyways. Shut down the oil industry, shut down the rails. Ok,
I get it. Canadians don't like money. So, it shouldn't matter if flight instructors are paid the same as yoga
instructors.
Summary:
1000TT for a class 4 instructor rating
2000TT & ATPL for CFI (class 1 or 2)
Canadians don't like money