[quote]need a pilot to be in the plane when the automated stuff goes wonky[/quote]
This sounds good in theory, but practice has shown us that especially
as time goes by, the pilots in the cockpit with weaker and weaker skills
are NOT capable of recognizing when automation goes bad - they cannot
take over and do the "right thing".
See the Indonesia 737 who's "safety system" (try to ignore the irony)
ran the trim all the way nose down, and crashed vertically ... to avoid
a stall.
The two pilots on board that airplane were miles behind it. No one
can pretend that they got ahead of the automation, took over, and
did the "right thing" that we pilots think is our job.
Look at Asiana 218 ... crashed a B777 in perfect wx, when they
tried to hand-fly it. What kind of a backup to faulty automation were
that crew?
How did AF447 handle their pitot failure? By holding the stick all the
way back for 3.5 minutes until they crashed into the ocean.
First, pilots need to get really good at the fundamentals. This is something
that is disappearing as time goes by. Without that fundamental skill, they
are incapable of hand-flying the aircraft when shit goes south.
People think I'm a silly old man that doesn't know anything compared to
them, and they're probably right.
But IMHO if you think you're worth $300k/yr as a pilot, you should fucking
well learn to hand-fly smoothly and precisely - like George Lothian.
Become a master of your trade.
[img width=500 height=332]
http://www.dauntless-soft.com/products/ ... and_15.jpg[/img]
You owe it to your craft to be confident that you could do that.
Needles in the donuts. You on the left side of the LOC, your FO on the right side of the LOC.