Page 1 of 2

NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:52 pm
by John Swallow
There's one in every crowd...  (;>0)

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:25 am
by Four Bars
Colour blind, maybe?
Or looking at a negative of the approved-Pitts paint scheme and got confused?

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:13 am
by Slick Goodlin
You could just as easily say the odd one out is the one with the square tail and Grove(?) gear.  Or the S-1 that's slipped into the mix...

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 3:30 am
by Colonel
Reminds me.  Years ago at the Curtis Pitts Fly-in at Ozark
Alabama, there were at least 40 Pitts, most of them red
and white.

Everyone was messing around.  The tower from Dothan
even called over and told us to knock it off.

It was glorious.  If someone did a roll on takeoff, and
some hall monitor reported it, there were 39 other red
and white Pitts flying the same day at the same place.

Who, me?

[img width=500 height=385][/img]

Curtis and Marshall.  Great people, good times.

[img width=394 height=500]http://www.acroflyer.com/curtispitts/im ... Cover1.jpg[/img]

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:17 am
by John Swallow
If I had unlimited money, I'd get one.  However, being an annuitant on a fixed income (;>0) I'll stick with the RV.

Maybe I can guilt my children into bankrolling a trip to Steinbach for a few hours in one...

J

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:49 pm
by Colonel
[quote]If I had unlimited money, I'd get one[/quote]

That doesn't make any sense.  An RV costs 10x what
a Pitts costs.  Remember someone here was complaining
that they were expensive, and I went to Barnstormers
and found a mostly completed project for under $2,000
(no typo).

Remember Sammy Mason, when he was 16, bought a
Pitts project and put it together and he flies airshows
in it now.  Canadians try to deny that, because it
makes them look bad, but it's the truth.

A Pitts is not an expensive airplane, like a composite
monoplane.  I know a billionaire pilot, he has an Extra,
not a tube & fabric Pitts with 1930's technology that
any blue collar guy can afford and build.

Canadians are so weird about money.  They hate it,
and they hate people with it, and they blame a lack
of it for all their woes.

Anyone that's willing to work hard can have a Pitts.

Always with the money, money, money.  Canadians
hate money, as far as I can tell, and they want
Kathleen Wynne and Justin Trudeau to get rid of
it all as fast as they can, so that all Canadians
are impoverished in the future, just like the
socialist dream that is Venezuela.

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:52 pm
by Barneydhc82
Now this guy is really colour blind


[URL=http://s60.photobucket.com/user/alleyca ... 1.jpg.html][img width=500 height=313]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h40/a ... uff.11.jpg[/img][/URL]


[URL=http://s60.photobucket.com/user/alleyca ... 2.jpg.html][img width=500 height=375]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h40/a ... CN2622.jpg[/img][/URL]


Both in 1:32 scale

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:30 pm
by cgzro
"It was glorious.  If someone did a roll on takeoff, and
some hall monitor reported it, there were 39 other red
and white Pitts flying the same day at the same place."

Hehe.. Thats why I got the same color scheme as yours :)

Reminds me of practice day at Montecello in 2007.. yowza!

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:10 pm
by Barneydhc82

Re: NONCONFORMITY

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:28 pm
by Barneydhc82
Which one of these doesn't belong here in a Pitts line-up?\


[URL=http://s60.photobucket.com/user/alleyca ... p.jpg.html][img width=500 height=375]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h40/a ... Lineup.jpg[/img][/URL]