Why Chuck Laughs At Class One Instructors
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 2:42 am
This seems to mystify people, so I'll have a go.
Chuck is perpetually amazed - and people might
be a wee bit tired of hearing - that he just can't
believe that a class 1 instructor can't fly a light
tailwheel trainer.
A little perspective. Taildraggers, despite the
nonsense you might have heard, are not [i]fire
breathing dragons[/i]. Student pilots fly them.
In fact, they are certified aircraft. You might not
be aware, but it's a giant pain in the ass to
certify an aircraft with TC. You have to prove
that any moron PPL isn't going to hurt himself
in it. It's gotta be docile as fuck.
Chuck finds it incredible that today's class 1
instructor don't have the stick and rudder skills
of a borderline PPL. This blows his fucking
mind, in fact.
Today's class 1 instructors want a full type
rating course - weeks of ground and flight
training - to fly a certified aircraft.
This makes me laugh so hard I pee my pants,
and people don't like me because I am a
[b]BAD PERSON[/b]. Got that.
But does a class 1 flight instructor really
need a full type conversion course to safely
fly a light taildragger?
CAR 405.22:
[quote]Aircraft Familiarization
405.22 No person shall conduct flight training in an aircraft unless the person is familiar with the flight characteristics, operating limitations and operational performance data specified in the aircraft flight manual or equivalent document.[/quote]
TC says that to give dual on a type, the flight
instructor must review the POH, and off he goes.
Needless to say, today's class 1 flight instructors
fall a long way short of that mark.
And they are the "Best of the Best".
What they are, are paper-pushing penguins. You
may recall that penguins can't fly. And, this is
Transport's great achievement in flight training
standards, after fiercely gate-keeping flight
instructor qualification for many decades:
Instructors that don't have a clue how to use
the rudder pedals.
Bravo.
Chuck is perpetually amazed - and people might
be a wee bit tired of hearing - that he just can't
believe that a class 1 instructor can't fly a light
tailwheel trainer.
A little perspective. Taildraggers, despite the
nonsense you might have heard, are not [i]fire
breathing dragons[/i]. Student pilots fly them.
In fact, they are certified aircraft. You might not
be aware, but it's a giant pain in the ass to
certify an aircraft with TC. You have to prove
that any moron PPL isn't going to hurt himself
in it. It's gotta be docile as fuck.
Chuck finds it incredible that today's class 1
instructor don't have the stick and rudder skills
of a borderline PPL. This blows his fucking
mind, in fact.
Today's class 1 instructors want a full type
rating course - weeks of ground and flight
training - to fly a certified aircraft.
This makes me laugh so hard I pee my pants,
and people don't like me because I am a
[b]BAD PERSON[/b]. Got that.
But does a class 1 flight instructor really
need a full type conversion course to safely
fly a light taildragger?
CAR 405.22:
[quote]Aircraft Familiarization
405.22 No person shall conduct flight training in an aircraft unless the person is familiar with the flight characteristics, operating limitations and operational performance data specified in the aircraft flight manual or equivalent document.[/quote]
TC says that to give dual on a type, the flight
instructor must review the POH, and off he goes.
Needless to say, today's class 1 flight instructors
fall a long way short of that mark.
And they are the "Best of the Best".
What they are, are paper-pushing penguins. You
may recall that penguins can't fly. And, this is
Transport's great achievement in flight training
standards, after fiercely gate-keeping flight
instructor qualification for many decades:
Instructors that don't have a clue how to use
the rudder pedals.
Bravo.