What a Deal!

Aviation & Pilots Forums, discuss topics that interest Pilots and Aviation Enthusiasts. Looking for information on how to become a pilot? Check out our Free online pilot exams and flight training resources section.
Post Reply
User avatar
The Dread Pilot Roberts
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 3:56 am

Quarter Million Canuck Pesos for a 1979 Cessna 172 with a basic panel and 500 hours on an engine overhauled in 2018.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

Isn’t that the one with the bad engine? H2AD eats its lifters?

How much for one with a good engine?
I ain't asking nobody for nothing, if I can't get it on my own.
User avatar
Scudrunner
Site Admin
Posts: 1225
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:18 am
Location: Drinking Coffee in FBO Lounge
Contact:

You're correct the 1977 N model was the first year with the O-320-H2AD engine, should be noted they replaced that with the O-320-D2J just a few years later.

When I was doing air tours/ fire patrol out of Pemberton it was a 172N and never had an issues. Should be noted most of the 172s where trainers getting the shit beat out of them obviously could contribute to causing issues.

Our operation we did fly the shit out of them but typically long flights minimum hour long and never had issues.

The older Continental I recall people muttering about them but honestly I found the older ones with the Continental 6 bangers smoother than the Lycoming 4 bangers.

No clue long term with the continentals.
Image
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

There was an AD on those H2AD engines that required an LW-16072 oil additive for extreme pressure to try to deal with the lifter/cam spalling, which as you point out, probably occurs at startup (like most engine wear).

That additive lives on in Aeroshell 15w50 and is the "plus" in W100plus and I might note, is NOT Camguard which as Monty Python once observed, is Something Completely Different™.

PS. Yes, the 6 cylinder Continentals sure ran a lot smoother than the 4 cylinder Lycomings, 99% of which didn't even have crankshaft counterweights and even brand new, ran rough.
I ain't asking nobody for nothing, if I can't get it on my own.
David MacRay
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:16 am

Here’s a 172 retractable gear for a mere $50,000 USD.

https://www.controller.com/listing/for- ... e-aircraft

Imagine trying to import it to Canader?
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post