Snowbird crash May 17, 2020

Aircraft Accident & Crash Investigation Topics
User avatar
Liquid_Charlie
Posts: 451
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2020 3:36 pm
Location: Sioux Lookout On.
Contact:

Code: Select all

Fast forward to this. Carrying passengers in antique jets.
News media here insists on calling her a pilot. Why is that??


"black air has no lift - extra fuel has no weight"
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

The only time the media tells the truth, is by accident.

She was not a rated pilot. She was not receiving or logging dual instruction.

She should not have been on board, or so I was told for decades, upon
threat of licence suspension and/or revocation.
As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
John Swallow
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:21 am

"She should not have been on board, or so I was told for decades, upon threat of licence suspension and/or revocation."

It could have been an AVRO 504K and it would have been legal.

Anyone hazard a guess as to why...?


J
John Swallow
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:21 am

PS Their crewmen travel with them between show sites also...
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

Different rules for different people. You're still allowed to live in Canada, John?
As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
John Swallow
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:21 am

Different rules?

Of course different rules. They are in the military. She was no different than the crewmen who ride between shows. With the proper authority, they could even legally take you with them...

Everybody knows that...

As for still living in Canada: of course; I have tenure!!! :lol:
TundraTire
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 3:47 am

This video has a clip that appears to show an object getting sucked into the engine just prior to the pitch up:

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1740577859866/
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

Two thoughts:

1) re: "different rules" ... well, as long as everything worked out ok
2) re: FOD ... remember, turbine is reliable, piston is unreliable
As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
John Swallow
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:21 am

"different rules ... well, as long as everything worked out ok"

Andrew: I don't understand the thrust of your statement.

In the military, members of the force routinely fly in military aircraft. It was the same in your father's day as in mine. The PR people - as with the technicians - routinely fly in the Tutor. It is not classified as an "antique" aircraft. The venerable T-33 had its first flight in 1952 with the last one being retired in 2005.

?
User avatar
Colonel
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:02 pm
Location: Over The Runway

I understand there is considerable risk when a passenger is carried in an antique single-engine
turbine aircraft operated by a civilian, but this is not the case when it is operated by the military.

This is crystal clear to me. Threats received loud and clear, and are in the rear view mirror.
As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post